
Triple B
EPIC GAMER
Epic LEVEL
Most of the ideas that have staying power don't really try to amass big profits but just try to survive by keeping the bankroll intact. Here is one such method.
The rules are simple:
(1) Bet selection - Decision Before Last, Banker Only. B P - bet B (or) B B - bet B. Otherwise no bet. You will catch all the long banker streaks and chops but the twos will kill you. Why Banker Only? Banker wins more than 50% of the bets so you will win more bets than you lose. Banker also has the lowest house edge.
(2) Money management - When our profits drop below zero (and only then) we employ a 7 step Martingale 1 2 4 8 16 32 64. If the 64 unit bet loses, we take the loss and reset to 1. If our profit is above zero we flat bet one unit. This gives us staying power but we don't really make much money. It keeps you in the game. You are just playing for comps, really.
Attached below is a simulation I ran on 2800 live shoes. Over 100,000 bets were placed. You can see that results are trying to drift higher despite sharp setbacks from time to time. I am confident, however, that given enough data, this method will implode and go hopelessly negative at some point. Eventually you will run a series of decisions that will impossible to recover from. A hard game to beat, this one.
The rules are simple:
(1) Bet selection - Decision Before Last, Banker Only. B P - bet B (or) B B - bet B. Otherwise no bet. You will catch all the long banker streaks and chops but the twos will kill you. Why Banker Only? Banker wins more than 50% of the bets so you will win more bets than you lose. Banker also has the lowest house edge.
(2) Money management - When our profits drop below zero (and only then) we employ a 7 step Martingale 1 2 4 8 16 32 64. If the 64 unit bet loses, we take the loss and reset to 1. If our profit is above zero we flat bet one unit. This gives us staying power but we don't really make much money. It keeps you in the game. You are just playing for comps, really.
Attached below is a simulation I ran on 2800 live shoes. Over 100,000 bets were placed. You can see that results are trying to drift higher despite sharp setbacks from time to time. I am confident, however, that given enough data, this method will implode and go hopelessly negative at some point. Eventually you will run a series of decisions that will impossible to recover from. A hard game to beat, this one.